DNA LineagesG Roy Fairbairn (F-3)
#1111
| Father | William Tate Fairbairn (1892 - 1960) |
| Mother | Ellen White |
| Lineage (Testee) | Roy was found to be part of Fairbairn Lineage 1 "clump 1", see here for chart. |
| Link2HaploGrpInfo (Group) | Click here to see those sharing G Roy's haplogroup (I1 confirmed - M253). |
| Researcher (Researcher) | Roy is researching the line of William Fairbairn *. Email: Roy (email current as at Nov 2008). |
| GeneticDistance (Testee) | At 12 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from Roy show: zero to Earl, Martin, Doug and William; 1 to Joe, Doug, Tom, David, David and (F-8). |
| GeneticDistance (Testee37Markers) | At 37 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from Roy show: zero to Earl; 1 to Martin; 2 to William and Michael; 3 to David(CAMPBELL); 4 to Doug(GOODFELLOW), Tom and Ron; 5 to Joe and John(JOHNSTON); 7 to David(TROTTER) and (F-8). |
| GeneticDistance (Testee67Markers) | At 67 markers the theoretical Genetic Distance (GD) calculations from Roy show: zero to Earl; 2 to William; 3 to Martin; 7 to Joe and David; 9 to (F-8); with Earl and Roy belonging to "clump 1" of Lineage 1, currently defined by marker 391 = 9 and 520 = 21. Joe (F-10) and David (F-9) being the two closer matches from "clump 2." |
| Summary (Witness) | We now have the preliminary dna results in for William (F-12), a documented descendant of John A Fairbairn Snr of Stillwater, Washington Co, MN, with Bill is indeed showing as an excellent match to Roy (F-3), the descendant of John's uncle William (phew!) The relationship to the other side of the Hoquiam triangle is rather murkier however as the representative of the Sunderland side of the triangle, Joe (F-10), belongs to "clump 2" of lineage 1. Still related, but how? With the full 67 marker results in, it rather looks like the 3rd side of the triangle represented by Joe (F-10), is showing marginally closer relationships with the lines of Thomas Fairbairn (marr. Elspeth Redpath), John Fairbairn (marr. Helen Campbell) and Trotter (marr. Jane Fairbairn) Fairbairn) lines. The expected relations above come a close second. The stated Genetic Distances of 5 for the lines of Thomas (REDPATH) and John (CAMPBELL) and 6/7, the John (FLINT) lines, can probably be marked one less because of the faster mutating markers involved. |